Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 9.2% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 10.5% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.2% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 9.8% 44 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 15.0% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 13.5% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 11.6% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 9.2% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 22.1% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 19.9% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 11.2% 56 Fragile Recovery
2012 7.0% 54 Fragile Recovery
2011 10.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOURDES RAMOS-RIVAS Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
JENNIFER CARR Vice President 3.4% of Rev
GABRIELA URTIAGA Artistic Director 3.2% of Rev
DINA BARAKAT DIR. OF BANQUETS & SPECIAL EVENTS 3.1% of Rev
CEDRIC WOOLFORK Treasurer 3.1% of Rev
SOLIMAR SOLAS Vice President 2.5% of Rev
ALISON HENEY Vice President 2.3% of Rev
MIKE DEOVLET Board President
ROBERT BRAUN MD Board President
SOFIA RILEY Board President
TIM DEGANI Treasurer
ZACH HOROWITZ Secretary
TIFFANY L BARBARA Board Member
MARIANNE GASTELUM Board Member
RICHARD A NERI Board Member
PAULA-ROSE WIHONGI Board Member
MARK TAYLOR Board Member
BURKE GUMBINER Board Member
CASTULO DE LA ROCHA Board Member
CELIA S DE BIRBRAGHER Board Member
LYNNE OKON SCHOLNICK Board Member
LISA MILTON Board Member
MARIO CORDERO Board Member
KIKI LIZARRAGA Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOURDES RAMOS-RIVAS Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
GABRIELA URTIAGA Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
CEDRIC WOOLFORK Treasurer 2.7% of Rev
BURKE GUMBINER Board Member
CASTULO DE LA ROCHA Board Member
CELIA S DE BIRBRAGHER Board Member
LYNNE SCHOLNICK Board Member
MIKE DEOVLET Board President
ROBERT BRAUN MD Board President
SOFIA RILEY Board President
TIM DEGANI Treasurer
ZACH HOROWITZ Secretary
TIFFANY L BARBARA Board Member
MARIANNE GASTELUM Board Member
RICHARD A NERI Board Member
PAULA-ROSE WIHONGI Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LOURDES RAMOS-RIVAS Executive Director 4.7% of Rev
TIM DEGANI Treasurer
MIKE DEOVLET Board President
BURKE GUMBINER Board Member
ROBERT BRAUN MD Board President
ROSE ANN DJELMANE Board Member
SOFIA RILEY Board President
ZACH HOROWITZ Secretary
LYNNE SCHOLNICK Board Member
DIANE HENSCHEL Board Member
CASTULO DE LA ROCHA Board Member
MICHAEL MILLER Board Member
CELIE DE BIRBRAGHER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 43 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points above the peer median (60 vs. 43).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.