Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 43 Fragile Recovery
2022 42 Fragile Recovery
2021 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 43 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MIKE CONNER AS OF 072024 Board Member
JAMES SMITH Treasurer
ROBERT AYRES EXIT 72524 Board Member
BILL HUCK exit 042024 Board Member
PETER THOMS Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES SMITH Treasurer
ROBERT AYRES Board Member
BILL HUCK Board Member
PETER THOMS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES SMITH Treasurer
ROBERT AYRES Board Member
BILL HUCK Board Member
PETER THOMS Board Member
KEN WINSLOW Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in CA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.