Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 17.3% 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 6.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 7.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 13.5% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 10.5% 52 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 9.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 10.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 3.6% 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — 12.4% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 12.7% 52 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 10.7% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maria Mingalone Executive Director 7.1% of Rev
Marilyn Agredano Board Member —
David Arnold Board Member —
Helen Frey Treasurer —
Regina Wilson Board Member —
Paula Doss Board Member —
Aaron Shebest Board Member —
Cadie Browne Lee Board Member —
Cathy Crowser Board Member —
Allyson Handley Board President —
Scott Bruckner Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maria Mingalone Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
Marilyn Agredano Board Member —
Pam Smith Treasurer —
Terri Peterson Zimdars Board President —
David Arnold Board Member —
Board Member —
Kathleen Griffin Haidet Board Member —
Helen Frey Board Member —
Regina Wilson Board Member —
Paula Doss Secretary —
Jerry Harder Board Member —
Ed Parish Board Member —
Aaron Shebest Board President —
Brian John Morales Board Member —
Cadie Lee Board Member —
Alan Zeleznikar Board Member —
Scott Madison Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maria Mingalone Executive Director 5.8% of Rev
Marilyn Agredano Board Member —
Pam Smith Treasurer —
Terri Peterson Zimdars Board President —
David Arnold Board Member —
Peter Rogers Board President —
Rudy Van Hunnick Board Member —
Paula Doss Board Member —
Regina Wilson Board Member —
Helen Frey Secretary —
Jerry Harder Board Member —
Ed Parish Board Member —
Aaron Shebest Board Member —
Jonathan Fohrman Board Member —
Brian John Morales Board Member —
Kevin Shine Board Member —
Alan Zeleznikar Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maria Mingalone Executive Director 5.5% of Rev
Marilyn Agredano Board Member —
Pam Smith Treasurer —
Terri Peterson Zimdars Board President —
David Arnold Board Member —
Peter Rogers Board President —
Robin Douglas Board Member —
Malena Bennett Board Member —
Billie Nunan Board Member —
Rudy Van Hunnick Board Member —
Paula Doss Board Member —
Regina Wilson Board Member —
Helen Frey Secretary —
Jerry Harder Board Member —
Ed Parish Board Member —
Aaron Shebest Board Member —
Alan Zeleznikar Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 333 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 36 points below the peer median (45 vs. 81).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.