Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 37 Fragile Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAMUEL LIN Board President
LINDA CHEN Secretary
DORIS YU Treasurer
SAMUEL LIN Board President
LINDA CHEN Secretary
DORIS YU Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAMUEL LIN Board President
LINDA CHEN Secretary
DORIS YU Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SAMUEL LIN Board President
LINDA CHEN Secretary
DORIS YU Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 26 points below the peer median (5 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.