Steady State
What does this mean?
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
The Path Forward
The Stewardship
Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 64 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2021 | — | — | — | 60 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2020 | — | — | — | 53 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2019 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2018 | — | — | — | 61 | Stable | Stable Watch | |
| 2017 | — | — | — | 59 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KATYA CHAN | Treasurer | — | ||
| HOLLY FISCHER | Board Member | — | ||
| DIANE MEZA | Board Member | — | ||
| ASH MINER | Board Member | — | ||
| ERIKO TSUJI | ACADEMY DIRECTO | — | ||
| JENNIFER VISICK | Board President | — | ||
| JOHN YORK | Secretary | — | ||
| JOSEPH KAYE | Board Member | — | ||
| GENE WIE | Board Member | — | ||
| APRIL CHOCOLATY | Board Member | — | ||
| CHRISTINE JELBERT | Executive Dir. | — |
Tax year 2022
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JENNIFER VISICK | Board President | — | ||
| RIE OKIMURA | MANAGER | — | ||
| ANN WU | Treasurer | — | ||
| GENE WIE | ADVISOR | — | ||
| APRIL CHOCOLATY | Board Member | — | ||
| CHRISTINE JELBERT | Executive Dir. | — | ||
| KATYA CHAN | Secretary | — | ||
| HOLLY FISCHER | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 67 points above the peer median (100 vs. 33).
5-year trend: Steady State
No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.
Overall score has gone from 53 → 61 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.