Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
28
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 26.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 23.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 35.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 34.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 29.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 20.7% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 16.5% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 23.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 16.2% 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 22.4% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 38.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 19.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 20.2% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MOLLY PURYEAR EXECUTIVE DI 14.1% of Rev
JOHN MALASHOCK Board Member 12.8% of Rev
ANN FEE Secretary
MARTHA GRIMES Treasurer
IDYLIA HACHI Board Member
ANDREW MEYERS Board Member
STEPHEN SAMUELS Board Member
RICHARD TRUJILLO Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MOLLY PURYEAR EXECUTIVE DI 8.7% of Rev
JOHN MALASHOCK Board Member 8.7% of Rev
CHRISTINE MARSHALL Secretary
EVELYN OLSSON-LAMDEN Board Member
KAREN ROQUE Secretary
ERIC WHITE Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN MALASHOCK Board Member 11.1% of Rev
MOLLY PURYEAR Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
CHRISTINE MARSHALL Secretary
EVELYN OLSSON-LAMDEN Board Member
PATRICIA O'CONNOR CHAIRMAN (UNTIL JULY)
ERIC WHITE Treasurer
KAREN ROQUE Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOHN MALASHOCK Board Member 10.8% of Rev
MOLLY PURYEAR Executive Director 7.8% of Rev
CATHY REMPEL Board Member
EVELYN OLSSON-LAMDEN Board Member
PATRICIA O'CONNOR CHAIRMAN
ERIC WHITE Treasurer
KAREN ROQUE Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 26.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~10 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.