Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
45
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 21.6% 45 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 — — 19.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 18.8% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 21.3% 41 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 16.2% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 — — 16.0% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — 15.0% 35 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 15.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 14.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2015 — — 14.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 14.9% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 2.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 — — — 42 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Simmons Sandra Executive Director 21.6% of Rev
Henslee Jay Board Member —
Montoya George Board Member —
Faircloth Megan Board Member —
Martini Rachelle Board Member —
Varco Susan Board President —
Gattey Jennifer Board President —
Paule D Candis Secretary —
Stewart Patrick Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sandra Simmons Executive Director 21.6% of Rev
Leo Divinsky Board Member —
Jay L Henslee Board Member —
George Montoya Board Member —
Jimmy Parker Board Member —
Christine Kong Board Member —
Suzanne R Varco Board President —
Jennifer Gattey Board President —
Patrick Stewart Treasurer —
D Candis Paule Secretary —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sandra Simmons Executive Director 20.6% of Rev
Suzanne R Varco Board President —
Jennifer Gattey Board President —
Patrick Stewart Treasurer —
D Candis Paule Secretary —
Larry Marshall Board Member —
Jay L Henslee Board Member —
George Montoya Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 20 points below the peer median (45 vs. 65).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.