Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
42
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 13.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 30.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 23.8% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 16.4% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAIGE MADDUX CHIEF DEVELOPMENT OFFICER 13.8% of Rev
TONYA GOLLOTTE Executive Director 5.4% of Rev
JENNIFER VAN MOORLEHEM Executive Director 4.9% of Rev
FRANK DEBLASI Board President
SHANNON WHITFIELD Treasurer
JAN JONES BLACKHURST Board Member
STEVEN CAREY Board Member
MONICA MUNSON Board Member
GERI TOMICH Board Member
DANIEL WANI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAIGE MADDUX Board Member 8.4% of Rev
JENNIFER VAN MOORLEHEM Executive Director 2.3% of Rev
FRANK DEBLASI Board President
SHANNON KESSLER Treasurer
DANIEL WANI Board Member
GERALDINE TOMICH Board Member
MATTHEW DEBLASI Board Member
MONICA MUNSON Board Member
STEVEN CAREY Board Member
LENISE LIGON Board Member
JAN JONES BLACKHURST Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in AZ for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.