Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
23
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 21.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lois Abdelmalek Board President
Tadan Middleton Treasurer
Shiloh Mugar Board Member
Sofia Dobel Board Member
Diamond Franklin Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Georgina Bard Artistic Director 29.5% of Rev
Jennifer Jaynes Board President
Justin Calazzo Board President
Suzanne Brubaker Treasurer
Christine Petrini Secretary
Randy Peterson Board Member
Lesley Zaya Board Member
David Burgess Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 296 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (10 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.