Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
39
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 46.2% 39 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 76.2% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 59 Fragile Recovery
2015 49 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jordan Groh Accompanist 46.2% of Rev
Barry Sawyer Artistic Director
Karen Jordan Board President
Joan Marie Sipe Secretary
Louise Adams Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Good Accompanist 32.3% of Rev
David Sauder Treasurer
Barry Sawyer Artistic Director
Leon Brubaker Board President
Louise Adams Treasurer
Barry L Sawyer Artistic Director
Anne L Lefever Accompanist
Anna Boriak Board President
David Sauder Treasurer
Barry L Sawyer Artistic Director
Anne L Lefever Accompanist
Anna Boriak Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Barry Sawyer Artistic Director
Anne Lefever Accompanist
Anna Boriak Board President
Louise Adams Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points above the peer median (70 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 46.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.