Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 13.2% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 15.1% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 14.9% 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 15.2% 41 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 30.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 15.8% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 9.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2015 15.1% 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 13.3% 44 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 29.9% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2012 4.2% 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE L POE Board Member 14.3% of Rev

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JULIE L POE Board Member 14.1% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Julie L Poe Board Member 13.0% of Rev

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Julie L Poe Board Member 12.2% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.