Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
61
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
100
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 51 Fragile Recovery
2021 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 50 Fragile Recovery
2019 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 47 Fragile Recovery
2014 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TONI SWEARINGEN Secretary
MICHAEL RHOADES Board President
DANIELLE COCHRAN Treasurer
JENNIFER SHEA Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID JONES Board President
DOUG HAFER Board President
JOY WATKINS OFFICER
LORETTA MAGERS Treasurer
MICHAEL RHOADES Secretary
DANIELLE COCHRAN Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID JONES Board President
DOUG HAFER Board President
JOY WATKINS OFFICER
LORETTA MAGERS Treasurer
MICHAEL RHOADES Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
100 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
61 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 59 points above the peer median (100 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 46 → 61 over 5 years (improving by 15 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.