Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 10.1% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2022 7.4% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 22.5% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 21.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 9.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 18.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 17.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 17.0% 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 16.3% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 5.0% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 13.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 18.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Patricia Burke Board Member 5.4% of Rev
Heather Jessup Artistic Director 4.7% of Rev
Katie Traverse Board President
Jennifer Annabel Board President
Marianne Zollman Secretary
Cara Holloway Treasurer
Emily Ewart Board Member
Galan Ruelos Board Member
Leon Jackson Board Member
Molly Terwilliger Board Member
Margaret Chaykin Board Member
Tammie Trank Board Member
Collins Grossman Board Member
Jennifer Harris Board Member
Alessandra Savitski Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Jessup Artistic Director 4.3% of Rev
Melina Markland Artistic Director 4.0% of Rev
Patti Burke Board President
Marianne Zollman Secretary
Cara Holloway Treasurer
Jennifer Annable Board Member
Emily Ewart Board Member
Galan Ruelos Board Member
Simone Torres Board Member
Katie Traverse Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Jessup Artistic Director 4.3% of Rev
Melina Markland Artistic Director 4.3% of Rev
Patti Burke Board President
Marianne Zollman Secretary
Cara Holloway Treasurer
Jennifer Annable Board Member
Emily Ewart Board Member
Leslie Margarones Board Member
Jennifer Muzia Board Member
Jim Ruddy Board Member
Galan Ruelos Board Member
Simone Torres Board Member
Katie Traverse Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Heather Jessup Artistic Director 3.3% of Rev
Melina Markland Artistic Director 2.8% of Rev
Patti Burke Board President
Marianne Zollman Secretary
Cara Holloway Treasurer
Galan Ruelos Board Member
Jennifer Annable Board Member
Jennifer Richardson Board Member
Jeffray Lewis Board Member
Jim Ruddy Board Member
Leslie Margarones Board Member
Simone Torres Board Member
Jennifer Muzia Board Member
Katie Traverse Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 4 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points below the peer median (15 vs. 66).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.