Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
70
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 13.2% 53 Fragile Recovery
2021 18.6% 46 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 41 Fragile Recovery
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 57 Fragile Recovery
2014 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 53 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 57 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN LOGUE Executive Director 12.2% of Rev
CHUCK TAYLOR Board President
JIM BROWN Secretary
DUANE CAMPBELL Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KAREN LOGUE Executive Director 12.2% of Rev
CHUCK TAYLOR Board President
JIM BROWN Secretary
DUANE CAMPBELL Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
70 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points above the peer median (70 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.