Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
46
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 9.9% 46 Fragile Recovery
2022 13.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2021 25.2% 44 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 20.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 20.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 21.6% 35 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 21.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 21.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2012 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Benjamin Coy Executive Director 22.6% of Rev
Donald Gliebe Board President
David Hejmanowski Board President
Thomas Bixler Secretary
Richard Thayer Treasurer
Carolyn Asher Board Member
Pamela Beery Board Member
Gina Calcamuggio Board Member
John Eufinger Board Member
William Fowles Board Member
Gretta Kumpf Board Member
Jeff Uhrich Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 14.6% of Rev
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 9.2% of Rev
BENJAMIN COY EXECUTIVE DI 0.8% of Rev
DONALD GLIEBE Board President
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE
TOM BIXLER Secretary
PAM BEERY Board Member
RICHARD EDWARDS Board Member
JOHN EUFINGER Board Member
GINA CALCAMUGGIO Board Member
WILLIAM FOWLES Board Member
JENNIFER JOLLEY Board Member
DICK THAYER Board Member
JEFF UHRICH Board Member
CAROLYN ASHER Board Member
GRETTA KUMPF Board Member
DONALD GLIEBE Board President
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE
KENT KING Secretary
CHARLES MOORE Treasurer
PAM BEERY Board Member
CAROL BRULOTTE Board Member
RICHARD EDWARDS Board Member
JOHN EUFINGER Board Member
GINA CALCAMAGGIO Board Member
WILLIAM FOWLES Board Member
AMY PINNICK Board Member
JENNIFER JOLLEY Board Member
PAM TAYLOR Board Member
DICK THAYER Board Member
JEFF URICH Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 22.9% of Rev
DON GLIEBE Board President
KENT KING Secretary
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE
CHUCK MOORE Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
WARREN HYER EXECUTIVE DI 17.1% of Rev
DON GLIEBE Board President
KENT KING Secretary
DAVID HEJMANOWSKI VICE PRESIDE
CHUCK MOORE Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points above the peer median (45 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.