Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 Hidden Hidden — 46 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Brown Board President —
Rebekah Madden Board President —
Nick Bellmeyer Secretary —
Jennifer Strader Treasurer —
Sam Bergman Board President —
Carrie Robbins Board President —
Meagan Clark Tech Head —
Andrew Hockworth Board President —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rebekah Madden Board President —
Nick Bellmeyer Secretary —
Jennifer Strader Treasurer —
Sam Bergman Board President —
Carrie Robbins Board President —
Meagan Clark Tech Head —
Andrew Hockworth Board President —
Jim Brown Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Brown Board President —
Rebecca Madden Board President —
Carrie Thurston Secretary —
Mark Goodwin Treasurer —
Sam Bergman Board President —
Carrie Robbins Board President —
Scott Madden Board President —
Aaron Brewer Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 329 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 20 points above the peer median (75 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.