Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
22
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 87.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 43.6% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 27.2% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 20.1% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 59 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BRUCE SMITH Board President
CATHY ROMA Board Member
BIL FARRAR Board Member
CHRIS WESTHOFF Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS WESTHOFF Board Member 20.5% of Rev
CHRIS WESTHOFF Board Member 5.6% of Rev
BRUCE SMITH Board President
BRUCE SMITH Board President
WES EASTON Board Member
WES EASTON Board Member
MIKE HASSEL Board Member
MIKE HASSEL Board Member
LAURA LUCAS Secretary
LAURA LUCAS Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHRIS WESTHOFF Board Member 18.9% of Rev
BOB LUCAS Artistic Director 13.5% of Rev
BRUCE SMITH Board President
WES EASTON Board Member
MIKE HASSEL Board Member
LAURA LUCAS Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 213 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 36 points below the peer median (5 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.