Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 19.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 21.3% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 13.0% 39 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 15.4% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — 13.7% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2015 — — 14.8% 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 13.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 14.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 13.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 10.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA STONE EXECUTIVE DI 11.8% of Rev
DARLA SALLEE EXECUTIVE DI 0.7% of Rev
MARILYN AULT Board Member —
PAULA BIVENS Board Member —
ANGELA EDEN Board Member —
DAVID HAPPE Board Member —
LEILA KELLEY Board Member —
KATHI MEYER Board Member —
HOLLY MILLER Board Member —
NANCY RICKER Board Member —
LAURA SANDLIN Board Member —
SYDNEY SCHIEVE Board Member —
DAVID SHADE Board Member —
SHELLY SPARKS Board Member —
KENDALL ZINSER Board Member —
ANGELA BARBOSA Board President —
JESSICA CARSON-BANNON VICE PRESIDE —
MICHELE HOCKWALT Board President —
CINDY LANANE PAST PRESIDE —
DR E DARLENE MILLER PAST PRESIDE —
BRETT SPANGLER Treasurer —
JULIE STIERS Secretary —
RICK VALE PAST PRESIDE —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DANA STONE EXECUTIVE DI 17.2% of Rev
MARILYN AULT Board Member —
ANGELA BARBOSA Board Member —
STEPHEN BOURKE Board Member —
JESSICA CARSON-BANNON Board Member —
ANGELA EDEN Board Member —
DAVID HAPPE Board Member —
LAURA SANDLIN Board Member —
SYDNEY SCHIEVE Board Member —
DAVID SHADE Board Member —
JULIE STIERS Board Member —
KENDALL ZINSER Board Member —
PAULA BIVENS Secretary —
CINDY LANANE Board President —
DR E DARLENE MILLER PAST PRESIDE —
BRETT SPANGLER Treasurer —
RICK VALE VICE PRESIDE —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 181 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points below the peer median (15 vs. 54).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 37 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.