Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↓
Overall
43
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 15.4% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 14.5% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 14.7% 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 15.8% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 16.3% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 14.9% 49 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 16.2% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 — — 15.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 15.4% 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — 16.0% 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 15.7% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — 15.0% 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 23.6% 43 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JASON HAYDEN Executive Director 19.5% of Rev
MARY BRYAN HOOD Board President 18.1% of Rev
DAVID E BOSWELL Board Member —
DR JAMES F NAAS CHAIRMAN —
DR R WATHEN MEDLEY JR CHAIRMAN EMERITUS —
GAIL REISZ BRANCH Board Member —
NICK HETMAN Board Member —
ANN MURPHY KINCHELOE Board Member —
ROBIN FAITH POTTER Board Member —
SELMA WIESENBERG Board Member —
JOANNA KENDALL Board Member —
PAM SMITH-WRIGHT Board Member —
JIM ESTES Board Member —
HELEN BRADLEY Board Member —
BROOK FORREST WHITE JR Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY BRYAN HOOD Board President 20.5% of Rev
DAVID E BOSWELL Board Member —
DR JAMES F NAAS CHAIRMAN —
DR R WATHEN MEDLEY JR Board Member —
GAIL REISZ BRANCH Board Member —
H DEAN JONES II Board Member —
JOHN A MEDLEY JR Board Member —
ROBIN FAITH POTTER Board Member —
KATHRYN RAYMER Board Member —
JOANNA KENDALL Board Member —
PAM SMITH-WRIGHT Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY BRYAN HOOD Board President 20.5% of Rev
B DEAN STANLEY CHAIRMAN EMERITUS —
DAVID E BOSWELL Board Member —
DR JAMES F NAAS CHAIRMAN —
DR R WATHEN MEDLEY JR Board Member —
GAIL REISZ BRANCH Board Member —
H DEAN JONES II Board Member —
JOHN A MEDLEY JR Board Member —
ROBIN FAITH POTTER Board Member —
KATHRYN RAYMER Board Member —
JOANNA KENDALL Board Member —
PAM SMITH-WRIGHT Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARY BRYAN HOOD Board President 20.5% of Rev
B DEAN STANLEY CHAIRMAN EMERITUS —
DAVID E BOSWELL Board Member —
DR JAMES F NAAS CHAIRMAN —
DR R WATHEN MEDLEY JR Board Member —
GAIL REISZ BRANCH Board Member —
H DEAN JONES II Board Member —
JOHN A MEDLEY JR Board Member —
ROBIN FAITH POTTER Board Member —
KATHRYN RAYMER Board Member —
JOANNE KENDALL Board Member —
BRENT YONTS Board Member —
ROBIN FAITH POTTER Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 42 other orgs in KY with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 37 points below the peer median (45 vs. 82).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.