Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
34
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 1.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 1.9% 38 Fragile Recovery
2020 1.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 0.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 55 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANTHONY SANDOVAL Board Member 0.6% of Rev
CAMERON KOLBER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
JORDAN BATTA Board Member
JULIE BLANKENSHIP Board Member
KEVIN CUBILLAS Board President
STEVE DEMCHUK Treasurer
GRAHAM FULLER Board Member
ELIZABETH GOODRICH VICE PRESIDE
CAMERON HOENECKE Board Member
MEGAN MCDONALD Board Member
SETH REIDER Board Member
ERIC ROTH Secretary
TRISHA THOMPSON Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMERON KOLBER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
ANTHONY SANDOVAL Board Member 0.3% of Rev
ERIC ROTH Secretary 0.3% of Rev
JORDAN BATTA Board Member
JULIE BLANKENSHIP Board Member
JESSE BRAVERMAN Board Member
KEVIN CUBILLAS Board President
STEVE DEMCHUK Treasurer
GRAHAM FULLER Board Member
ELIZABETH GOODRICH VICE PRESIDE
MEGAN NAVARRO Board Member
TRISHA THOMPSON Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMERON KOLBER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
ANTHONY SANDOVAL Board Member 0.3% of Rev
JULIE BLANKENSHIP Board Member
JULIA BRODSKY Board Member
KEVIN CUBILLAS Board President
GRAHAM FULLER Board Member
ELIZABETH GOODRICH VICE PRESIDE
MEGAN NAVARRO Treasurer
ERIC ROTH Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMERON KOLBER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
ANTHONY SANDOVAL Board Member 0.3% of Rev
JULIE BLANKENSHIP Board Member
JULIA BRODSKY Board Member
KEVIN CUBILLAS Board President
GRAHAM FULLER Board Member
ELIZABETH GOODRICH VICE PRESIDE
MEGAN NAVARRO Treasurer
ERIC ROTH Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CAMERON KOLBER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
JEANIE BALCH Treasurer 0.1% of Rev
JULIA BRODSKY Board Member
KEVIN CUBILLAS Board President
GRAHAM FULLER Board Member
OLIVER GERLAND Board Member
ELIZABETH GOODRICH Board Member
ERIC ROTH Secretary
ILEANA STREET Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 31 points below the peer median (5 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.