Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
22
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 27.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 19.3% 37 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 19.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — — 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK C SOUTHERS Artistic Director 18.9% of Rev
ELIZABETH REISS Treasurer 4.6% of Rev
MONTEZE FREELAND Board Member 3.0% of Rev
ROYCE JONES Board Member 0.8% of Rev
MICHAEL RAMSEY Board President —
LORILLE READIE-SOUTHERS Secretary —
DELORES SOUTHERS Board Member —
TAWNYA FARRIS-REDWOOD Board Member —
JANIS BURLEY WILSON Board Member —
SUSAN MCGREGOR-LAINE Board Member —
MARK FREEMAN Board Member —
LYNN HAYES FREELAND Board Member —
DONNA DREWERY Board Member —
WAYNE WALTERS Board Member —
YARRA HOWZE Board Member —
MELISSA PEARLMAN Board Member —
BARBARA CYMERMAN Board Member —
J NICOLE RHODES Board Member —
ALAN HORD Board Member —
THELMA LOVETEE-MORRIS Board Member —
CHARLES TIMBERS Board Member —
CARLTON HAYWOOD Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK C SOUTHERS Artistic Director 14.6% of Rev
ELIZABETH REISS Treasurer 3.7% of Rev
MICHAEL RAMSEY Board President —
LORILLE READIE-SOUTHERS Secretary —
DON BELL Board Member —
DELORES SOUTHERS Board Member —
NIKKI JACKSON Board Member —
RYAN SCOTT Board Member —
TAWNYA FARRIS-REDWOOD Board Member —
JANIS BURLEY WILSON Board Member —
SUSAN MCGREGOR-LAINE Board Member —
CARLTON HEYWOOD Board Member —
MARK FREEMAN Board Member —
LYNN HAYES FREELAND Board Member —
DONNA DREWERY Board Member —
YARRA HOWZE Board Member —
MELISSA PEARLMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARK C SOUTHERS Artistic Director 15.5% of Rev
ELIZABETH REISS Treasurer 3.0% of Rev
MICHAEL RAMSEY Board President —
LORILLE READIE-SOUTHERS Secretary —
DON BELL Board Member —
DELORES SOUTHERS Board Member —
NIKKI JACKSON Board Member —
RYAN SCOTT Board Member —
TAWNYA FARRIS-REDWOOD Board Member —
JANIS BURLEY WILSON Board Member —
SUSAN MCGREGOR-LAINE Board Member —
CARLTON HEYWOOD Board Member —
MARK FREEMAN Board Member —
LYNN HAYES FREELAND Board Member —
DONNA DREWERY Board Member —
YARRA HOWZE Board Member —
MELISSA PEARLMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
22 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 461 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 27.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~11 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.