Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 55 Fragile Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Erin Bishop Board Member
Bob Baskerville Board President
Joshua Klobassa Treasurer
Tyler Klobassa Secretary
Arlene McAtee Secretary
James Stephenson Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN BISHOP Board Member
LISA RICHARDS AT LARGE
BOB BASKERVILLE Board President
JOSHUA KLOBASSA Treasurer
TYLER KLOBASSA Secretary
ARLENE MCATEE Secretary
JAMES STEPHENSON VICE PRESIDE

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN BISHOP Board Member
JOSHUA KLOBASSA BUSINESS MAN
TYLER KLOBASSA Board Member
KELLY MAYHEW PRODUCTION M
MARK MAYHEW TECH DIRECTO
ARLENE MCATEE Board Member
TOM PERRINE Artistic Director
JESSIE PHILLIPS Board Member
ROSE MARY SCHIRA Board Member
KATHY ARNDORFER Treasurer
BOB BASKERVILLE Board President
JAMES STEPHENS VICE PRECIDE
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 85 other orgs in IA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 16 points above the peer median (45 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.