Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
53
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 53 Fragile Recovery
2023 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 54 Fragile Recovery
2018 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMNON STEINER Treasurer
KATHY GAINES Board President
RACHEL HART KLAYMAN Board President
DEE CROWNOVER Board President
HEATHER CHARRON Secretary
SARA ADLER Secretary
STEPHANIE CASEY Board Member
LESLEY FARRELL Board Member
CAROLYN HILL Board Member
TODD MADDOCK Board Member
SUE ANN SAVAS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEVE GALBRAITH Board President
RACHEL KLAYMAN VICE PRESIDE
GLENN GOTTFRIED Treasurer
KAFI LARAMORE-JOSEY CORRESPOND S
LISA ZIEGLER RECORDING SE
STEVE GALBRAITH Board President
JULIE ROBERTS VICE PRESIDE
ED WALSH Treasurer
GLENN GOTTFRIED ASST TREASUR
SARAH CORCORAN CORRESPOND S
RACHEL KLAYMAN RECORDING SE
TERI SCHOTT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
53 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 186 other orgs in MI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (80 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 58 → 53 over 5 years (declining by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.