Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 44 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 41 Fragile Recovery
2016 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN JESPERSEN Board President
CAROLYN MCBURNEY Board President
CALLIE ALLRED Treasurer
ANDREA WUNIBALD Secretary
CHRIS QUILLIN PULBIC RELATIONS
JANE IDDINGS Board Member
JESSICA ANDERS PUBLIC RELATIONS
ELORA BLEISCH Board Member
ERIN JESPERSEN Board President
CAROLYN MCBURNEY Board President
CALLIE ALLRED Treasurer
CHRIS QUILLIN PUBLIC RELATIONS
JANE IDDINGS Board Member
JESSICA ANDERS Board Member
ELORA BLEISCH Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ERIN JESPERSEN Board President
VICTORIA SCHMICK Board President
AILEEN LEITHEAD Treasurer
VICTORIA SCHMICK Board President
CALLIE ALLRED Secretary
AILEEN LIETHEAD HISTORIAN
CAROLYN MCBURNEY PUBLIC RELATIONS
DIONA SAVOY-MCDANIELS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 14 other orgs in WY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (65 vs. 38).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 45 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.