Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden 52 Fragile Recovery
2023 15.3% 51 Fragile Recovery
2022 93.7% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 129.5% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 67.2% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 31.8% 50 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2018 4.6% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 4.1% 50 Fragile Recovery
2016 37.9% 43 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 10,342.2% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 54.6% 43 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 1,144.6% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 10.3% 52 Fragile Recovery
2011 40.6% 46 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Roxanne Shepherd Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
Susan Den Treasurer 5.5% of Rev
Anna DiMartino Board Member 5.3% of Rev
Eric Stelter Board President
Cathi Hatch Board President
Susan Liu Treasurer
Sandy Walsh Secretary
Alka Badshah Board Member
Doug Boyden Board Member
Jane Cui Board Member
Rosemarie Francis Board Member
Kemper Freeman Board Member
Jim Hebert Board Member
Charles Lytle Board Member
Janice Olson Board Member
Betty Tong Board Member
Brian Vowinkel Board Member
Nancy Walker Board Member
Scott Wallace Board Member
Melanie Bruch Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Roxanne Shepherd Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
Susan Den Treasurer 5.4% of Rev
Eric Stelter Board President
Cathi Hatch Board President
Susan Liu Treasurer
Sandy Walsh Secretary
Alka Badshah Board Member
Carl Behnke Board Member
Doug Boyden Board Member
Trish Carpenter Board Member
Jane Cui Board Member
Jenni Flinders Board Member
Rosemary Francis Board Member
Kemper Freeman Board Member
Jim Hebert Board Member
Charles Lytle Board Member
Janice Olson Board Member
Betty Tong Board Member
Brian Vowinkel Board Member
Nancy Walker Board Member
Scott Wallace Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Raymond Cullom Executive Director 22.2% of Rev
Roxanne Shepherd Executive Director 8.4% of Rev
Jodie Miner Former Chief Development Officer 7.4% of Rev
Eric Stelter Board President
Alex Smith Board President
Cathi Hatch Board President
Susan Liu Treasurer
Sandy Walsh Secretary
Alka Badshah Board Member
Carl Behnke Board Member
Doug Boyden Board Member
Trish Carpenter Board Member
Jane Cui Board Member
Jenni Flinders Board Member
Rosemary Francis Board Member
Betty Freeman Board Member
Kemper Freeman Board Member
Jim Hebert Board Member
Charles Lytle Board Member
Janice Olson Board Member
Betty Tong Board Member
Brian Vowinkel Board Member
Nancy Walker Board Member
Scott Wallace Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 10 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.