Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 61 Stable Stable Watch
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 65 Stable Stable Watch
2017 65 Stable Stable Watch
2016 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 65 Stable Stable Watch
2014 61 Stable Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cary Jordahl Board President
Perry Shields Board President
Ritas Smith Treasurer
Frank Pepito Secretary
Carol Giles N/A
John Jones N/A
Loren Gould N/A

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cary Jordah Board President
Perry Shields Board President
Ritas Smith Treasurer
Frank Pepito Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARY JORDAHL Board President
PERRY SHIELDS Board President
LINDA BARNETT Treasurer
FRANK PEPITO Secretary
CAROL GILES N/A
JOHN JONES N/A
LOREN GOULD N/A
CARY JORDAHL Board President
PERRY SHIELDS Board President
LINDA BARNETT Treasurer
FRANK PEPITO Secretary
CAROL GILES N/A
JOHN JONES N/A
LOREN GOULD N/A
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points above the peer median (75 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.