Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 21 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 18.8% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Allie Bordley Board President 20.4% of Rev
Chris Pacetti Vice President
Eileen Butler Board Member
John Owens Board Member
Teresa Gniazdowski Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Allie Bordley Board President
Chris Pacetti Vice President
Teresa Gniazdowski Secretary
Eileen Butler Board Member
John Owens Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Allie Bordley Board President
Chris Pacetti Vice President
Teresa Gniazdowski Secretary
Eileen Butler Board Member
John Owens Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in FL for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.