Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
43
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
45
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 43 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 50 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 38 Fragile Recovery
2019 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 37 Fragile Recovery
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 23 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 35 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MEGHAN DOUGHERTY Board President
LINDA HUMPHREYS Secretary
KEN LEIST Treasurer
JAY FRAZE Board Member
SUZAN MARKMAN Board Member
CAROLYN HUNTER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHLEEN ECONOMOS Board Member
JAY FRAZE Board Member
MARTI GRAZI Board Member
RICK PALM Board Member
PAT PAYNE Board Member
DAVID TAGIEFF Board Member
JUDY TODD Board Member
TOM BOTELHO Board President
LINDA HUMPHREY Secretary
MATT MEIER Board President
MARK MOORE Treasurer
MAXINE ROSSMAN Board President
MARK ROSSMAN Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
45 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
43 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 182 other orgs in CO with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 9 points above the peer median (45 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 27 → 43 over 5 years (improving by 16 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.