Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 33.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — 21.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 — — 21.8% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 18.4% 40 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KATHI WALL Executive Director 33.1% of Rev
KEITH LUKE CITY REP —
BOB DUBE Treasurer —
RICHARD PARKHURST Board President —
AMANDA TAYLOR Board Member —
ANDREW SILSBY Board Member —
MICHAEL HALL Board Member —
GARY PEACHEY Board Member —
ALICIA GAUDET Secretary —
CAROLINE SABAN Board Member —
KAREN BOSTON Board Member —
CAROLINE WATTS Board Member —
ANDREW LEBALANC Board Member —
RICK HENNING Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TOBIAS PARKHURST Board Member —
KEITH LUKE CITY REP —
BOB DUBE Treasurer —
STAN KOSKI Board Member —
RICHARD PARKHURST Board President —
SOO PARKHURST Secretary —
AMANDA TAYLOR Board Member —
PHYLLIS VON HERRLICH Board Member —
ANDREW SILSBY Board President —
CRYSTAL SULLIVAN Board Member —
MICHAEL HALL Board Member —
GARY PEACHEY Board Member —
NICOLE MCSWEENEY Board Member —
ALICIA GAUDET Board Member —
CAROLINE SABAN Board Member —
ELISA ELLIS Board Member —
KATHI WALL Executive Director —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 45 other orgs in ME with NTEE prefix A8.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 42 points below the peer median (42 vs. 84).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 40 → 29 over 5 years (declining by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~22 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.