Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
50
Score
Governance
43
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
85
Score

Governance Advisory

📋 Compliance Status

State Annual Report
Status: OVERDUE
Overdue: 192 days

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden 0.4% 50 Fragile Gov Risk
2024 Hidden Hidden 0.1% 47 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 Hidden 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 Hidden 44 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 Hidden 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 Hidden 42 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 Hidden 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 Hidden Hidden 2.7% 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 Hidden Hidden 1.5% 39 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 Hidden Hidden 8.3% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 Hidden Hidden 4.3% 41 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 Hidden Hidden 9.1% 36 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 Hidden Hidden 7.1% 46 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 Hidden Hidden 0.6% 50 Fragile Recovery
2009 Hidden 9 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICIA DICKINSON WELLS EXECUTIVE DI 0.4% of Rev
LOUIS GIANNINI Board Member 0.3% of Rev
EDWARD K MEREWETHER Board President
LINDA SEDILLO GONZALES Treasurer
VALERIE GARCIA Secretary
CYNTHIA HALL Board Member
CORALEE QUINTANA Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICIA DICKINSON WELLS Board Member 7.6% of Rev
EVA RIOS ORNELAS Secretary 0.4% of Rev
EDWARD K MEREWETHER EXECUTIVE PR
LINDA M SEDILLO GONZALES Treasurer
LOUIS GIANNINI Board Member
CYNTHIA HALL Board Member
CORALEE QUINTANA Board Member
VALERIE GARCIA Board Member
DOUGLAS STEWART Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICIA DICKINSON WELLS Board Member 7.2% of Rev
EVA RIOS ORNELAS Secretary 0.7% of Rev
EDWARD K MEREWETHER Board President
LOUIS GIANNINI Board Member
CYNTHIA HALL Board Member
CORALEE QUINTANA Board Member
VALERIE HARRIS Board Member
DOUGLAS STEWART Board Member
LINDA M SEDILLO GONZALES Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICIA DICKINSON WELLS Board Member 5.7% of Rev
EVA RIOS ORNELAS Secretary 0.5% of Rev
EDWARD K MEREWETHER Board President
LOUIS GIANNINI Board Member
CYNTHIA HALL Board Member
CORALEE QUINTANA Board Member
VALERIE GARCIA HARRIS Board Member
LINDA M SEDILLO GONZALES Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PATRICIA DICKINSON WELLS Board Member 2.8% of Rev
EVA RIOS ORNELAS Secretary 0.5% of Rev
EDWARD K MEREWETHER Board President
LOUIS GIANNINI Board Member
CYNTHIA HALL Board Member
CORALEE QUINTANA Board Member
VALERIE GARCIA HARRIS Board Member
LINDA M SEDILLO Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
43 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
85 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NM with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 53 points above the peer median (85 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 50 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.