Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 42 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 51 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Fragile Recovery
2014 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALBERT L EVANS Board Member
JOAN GUERS Board Member
SANDRA SCHWENK Board Member
PAM KLAHR Secretary
ALBERT J EVANS BJ Treasurer
MARY SAMANTHA BATES Board Member
BETH SHIELDS Board Member
BRIAN CALDERONE Board Member
DAN DOYLE Board Member
JOSETTE EVANS Board Member
LORRAINE FELKER Board Member
DEBBIE GILBERT Board Member
GARY HESS Board Member
KIM LORIMER Board President
CYNTHIA MENSCH Board President
CEIL MICHALIK Board Member
JENNIFER WALTON Board Member
JACQUELINE ENGEL Executive Dir.

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALBERT L EVANS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALBERT L EVANS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in PA for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.