Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
28
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
5
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 133.6% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 40 Fragile Recovery
2020 57 Fragile Recovery
2019 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Recovery
2013 3.4% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID JUDSON Artistic Director 189.1% of Rev
CRAIG DUNLAP Board President
STEVE SIMONIAN Board President
REGINA HANCHER Secretary
SCOTT MARAJ Treasurer
JOY SHERRATT Artistic Director
RANDALL STONER OFFICER
PAT PARR OFFICER - COFOUNDER

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CRAIG DUNLAP Board President
STEVE SIMONIAN Board President
REGINA HANCHER Secretary
SCOTT MARAJ Treasurer
DAVID JUDSON Artistic Director
JOY SHERRATT Artistic Director
PAT PARR CO-FOUNDER
RANDALL STONER OFFICER
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
28 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 27 points below the peer median (5 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 28 over 5 years (declining by 19 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.