Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 22.5% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 — — 25.6% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 34.8% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 29.6% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 22.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 24.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 24.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 24.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 19.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 18.0% 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — 23.5% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 — — 20.4% 37 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 22.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 — — — 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2009 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID M WOLFF Artistic Director 23.2% of Rev
KATHLEEN C WILFORD CHAIRMAN OF BOARD —
JANIE GOULD Board Member —
GREG COLLINS Board Member —
JOHN SAPP Secretary —
ALAN KANE Board Member —
C FOSTER BROWN Board Member —
ROBERT DEGANGE Treasurer —
ALAN BERANEK Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID M WOLFF Artistic Director 22.5% of Rev
KATHLEEN C WILFORD CHAIRMAN OF BOARD —
JANIE GOULD Board Member —
GREG COLLINS Treasurer —
JOHN SAPP Secretary —
ALAN KANE Board Member —
C FOSTER BROWN Board Member —
ROBERT DE GANGE Board Member —
ALAN BERANEK Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID M WOLFF Artistic Director 22.3% of Rev
DAVID M WOLFF Artistic Director 21.7% of Rev
KATHLEEN C WILFORD CHAIRMAN OF BOARD —
JANIE GOULD Board Member —
GREG COLLINS Treasurer —
JOHN SAPP Secretary —
ALAN KANE Board Member —
C FOSTER BROWN Board Member —
ROBERT DEGRANGE Board Member —
ALAN BERANEK Board Member —
KATHLEEN C WILFORD CHAIRMAN OF BOARD —
JANIE GOULD Board Member —
GREG COLLINS ROBERT DEGRANGE —
TREASURER Board Member —
AMANDA PAULL Secretary —
C FOSTER BROWN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID M WOLFF Artistic Director 21.7% of Rev
KATHLEEN C WILFORD CHAIRMAN OF BOARD —
JANIE GOULD Board Member —
GREG COLLINS ROBERT DEGRANGE —
TREASURER Board Member —
AMANDA PAULL Secretary —
C FOSTER BROWN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 221 other orgs in NC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 37 points below the peer median (15 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.