Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 54 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 43 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 43 Fragile Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Gouri Sankar Karmakar Board Member 51.0% of Rev
Subir Mukkerjee Board President
Argha Guha Secretary
Ravindra Shirtekar Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUBIR MUKHERJEE Board President
MOUSUMI KARMAKAR Board Member
ARGHA GUHA Board Member
RAVI SHIRTEKAR Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUBIR MUKHERJEE Board President
MOUSUMI KARMAKAR Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SUBIR MUKHERJEE Board President
PRASHANTH SHENOY Secretary
MOUSUMI KARMAKAR Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 132 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 34 points above the peer median (65 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.