Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
48
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 3.7% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 0.1% 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 0.1% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 1.5% 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 43 Fragile Recovery
2018 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 6.2% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA GHANDOUR PROGRAMMING 0.1% of Rev
KIRK RASMUSSEN CHAIRMAN
CONNIE KIESEL Secretary
SCOTT ANDERSEN Board Member
ROLAND CHRISTENSEN Board Member
DEBRA GREENER Board Member
VALENE KING Board Member
LORI NAY EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LORI NAY EXECUTIVE DI 1.2% of Rev
KIRK RASMUSSEN CHAIRMAN
CONNIE KIESEL Secretary
SCOTT ANDERSEN Board Member
ROLAND CHRISTENSEN Board Member
DEBRA GREENER Board Member
VALENE KING Board Member
MELISSA GHANDOUR PROGRAMMING
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in UT for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

Overall score has gone from 43 → 48 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.