Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
47
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 18.6% 46 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 115.7% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 11.8% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 36 Fragile Recovery
2017 46.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 9.5% 52 Fragile Recovery
2015 25.2% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 13.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 18.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 20.9% 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
GERARD SCHWARZ Artistic Director 25.2% of Rev
PAUL SCHWENDENER Executive Dir. 5.5% of Rev
MARLYS PALUMBO Board President
RALPH PALUMBO Board Member
JODY SCHWARZ Board Member
SUSAN HUTCHISON Board President
MICHELE GERBER KLEIN Board Member
TED PARKER Board Member
SHARON MOSSE Board Member
FRED MILLER Board Member
JAY E CANTOR Board Member
JERARD FARLEY Board Member
CHARLES STAADECKER Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL SCHWENDENER Executive Dir. 4.2% of Rev
MARLYS PALUMBO Board President
RALPH PALUMBO Board Member
JODY SCHWARZ Board Member
KATHLEEN WRIGHT Board Member
TOM FIRMAN Treasurer
SUSAN HUTCHISON Board President
MICHELE GERBER KLEIN Board Member
TED PARKER Board Member
GERARD SCHWARZ Artistic Director
SHARON MOSSE Board Member
FRED MILLER Board Member
FRANCES LAWRENCE Board Member
JAY E CANTOR Board Member
JERARD FARLEY Board Member
ERNIE KAFKA Board Member
CHARLES STAADECKER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL SCHWENDENER Executive Dir. 2.1% of Rev
MARLYS PALUMBO Board President
RALPH PALUMBO Board Member
JODY SCHWARZ Board Member
KATHLEEN WRIGHT Board Member
TOM FIRMAN Treasurer
SUSAN HUTCHISON Board President
MICHELE GERBER KLEIN Board Member
TED PARKER Board Member
GERARD SCHWARZ Artistic Director
SHARON MOSSE Board Member
FRED MILLER Board Member
FRANCES LAWRENCE Board Member
JAY E CANTOR Board Member
JERARD FARLEY Board Member
ERNIE KAFKA Board Member
CHARLES STAADECKER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 24 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A9.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 36 points above the peer median (60 vs. 24).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 36 → 47 over 5 years (improving by 11 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.