Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 68 Stable Stable Watch
2020 64 Stable Stable Watch
2019 64 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Eckloff Board President
Brandon K Moon Treasurer
Renee Tajudeen Board President
Stacey Claytor Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael O'Dell Chairman
Brandon K Moon Treasurer
Renee Tajudeen Secretary
Michael O'Dell Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael O'Dell Chairman
Brandon K Moon Treasurer
Renee Tajudeen Secretary
Dr Jessica Russo Revand Board President
Sharon Peterson Chairman
Michael O'Dell Board President
Brandon K Moon Treasurer
Renee Tajudeen Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in VA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 21 points below the peer median (15 vs. 36).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 64 → 35 over 5 years (declining by 29 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.