Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.8% 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 6.8% 45 Fragile Recovery
2021 13.8% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 4.8% 52 Fragile Recovery
2019 5.1% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 3.0% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 2.4% 48 Fragile Recovery
2016 2.1% 42 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 3.7% 38 Fragile Recovery
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 51 Fragile Recovery
2012 47 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE OLSON Board Member 6.4% of Rev
GRANT BAER Treasurer 1.6% of Rev
MIKE BOWCUT Board Member
CINDY DEWEY Board Member
STEPHEN SIMMONS Board President
SAM WINWARD Board Member
BRAD JOHNSON Board President
JEFF LOOSLI Board Member
CAROLYNN LARSON Board Member
CRAIG JESSOP Board Member
ANNE WADDOUPS Board Member
DOUGLAS LEMON Board Member
LILA GEDDES Board Member
NINA HUBBARD Board Member
SUE MEASOM Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE OLSON Board Member 5.9% of Rev
GRANT BAER Treasurer 0.9% of Rev
SCOTT WYATT Board President
MIKE BOWCUT Board Member
CINDY DEWEY Board Member
STEPHEN SIMMONS Board Member
SAM WINWARD Board Member
BRAD JOHNSON Board President
JEFF LOOSLI Board Member
CRAIG JESSOP Board Member
DOUGLAS LEMON Board Member
BARBARA DANIELS Board Member
LILA GEDDES Board Member
NINA HUBBARD Board Member
SUE MEASOM Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE OLSON Board Member 3.5% of Rev
GRANT BAER Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
MIKE BOWCUT Board Member
CINDY DEWEY Board Member
ABBY BENNINGHOFF Board Member
KERRY BRINGHURST Board Member
BRAD JOHNSON Board President
JEFF LOOSLI Board Member
CRAIG JESSOP Board Member
LESLIE TIMMONS Board Member
HERM OLSEN Board President
DOUGLAS LEMON Board Member
BARBARA DANIELS Board Member
LILA GEDDES Board Member
NINA HUBBARD Board Member
SUE MEASOM Board Member
CLAIRE CARDON Board Member
KENT STRATFORD Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE OLSON Board Member 3.5% of Rev
GRANT BAER Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
PAUL WOODLAND Board Member
CINDY DEWEY Board Member
ABBY BENNINGHOFF Board Member
KERRY BRINGHURST Board Member
BRAD JOHNSON Board President
JEFF LOOSLI Board Member
RICHARD RATLIFF Board Member
CRAIG JESSOP Board Member
LESLIE TIMMONS Board Member
HERM OLSEN Board President
DOUGLAS LEMON Board Member
CLAIRE CARDON Board Member
KENT STRATFORD Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ELAINE OLSON Board Member 2.8% of Rev
GRANT BAER Treasurer 0.5% of Rev
PAUL WOODLAND Board Member
WESTON ALLEN Board Member
CINDY DEWEY Board Member
ABBY BENNINGHOFF Board Member
KERRY BRINGHURST Board Member
BRAD JOHNSON Board Member
JEFF LOOSLI Board Member
RICHARD RATLIFF Board Member
CRAIG JESSOP Board Member
LESLIE TIMMONS Board Member
HERM OLSEN Board President
DOUGLAS LEMON Board Member
CLAIRE CARDON Board Member
KENT STRATFORD Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 81 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 31 points above the peer median (60 vs. 29).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.