Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
58
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | — | — | — | 58 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iris Kiesling | Board President | — | ||
| Anne Steigerwald | Secretary | — | ||
| Deb Allmayer | Treasurer | — | ||
| Audrey Heller | Artistic Director | — | ||
| Judith Rose | Board Member | — | ||
| Cindy Hmelo-Silver | Board Member | — | ||
| Stan Wasserman | Board Member | — | ||
| Darrell Stone | Board Member | — | ||
| Sheryl Doades | Board Member | — | ||
| Amalia Shifriss | Board Member | — | ||
| Ray Hedin | Board Member | — | ||
| Marshall Jacobs | Board Member | — | ||
| Paula Sunderman | Board Member | — | ||
| Iris Kiesling | Board President | — | ||
| Anne Steigerwald | Secretary | — | ||
| Deb Allmayer | Treasurer | — | ||
| Audrey Heller | Artistic Director | — | ||
| Judith Rose | Board Member | — | ||
| Cindy Hmelo-Silver | Board Member | — | ||
| Stan Wasserman | Board Member | — | ||
| Darrell Stone | Board Member | — | ||
| Sheryl Doades | Board Member | — | ||
| Amalia Shifriss | Board Member | — | ||
| Ray Hedin | Board Member | — | ||
| Marshall Jacobs | Board Member | — | ||
| Paula Sunderman | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
58 / 100
Stable
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 120 other orgs in IN with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 35 points above the peer median (75 vs. 40).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Insufficient history for trend analysis (need at least 2 years of data).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.