Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
34
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 7.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 6.8% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2021 — — 6.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 1.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 6.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 7.5% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 6.3% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2014 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — 17.4% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TERRI O'NEIL EXECUTIVE DI 6.7% of Rev
AMY WILLIAMS EXECUTIVE DI 1.1% of Rev
PHYLLIS ALBERTSON Secretary —
CAROL BELL Board Member —
CAROLYN BROWN Board Member —
PATRICIA CLARK Board Member —
STACI DONEGAN Board Member —
NINA EIDELL Board Member —
RACHEL FIELDS Board Member —
RICHARD FOSTER Board Member —
KENNETH BUD GREEN Board President —
DR JOEL GREENBERG Board Member —
LYON JEMISON Board Member —
DIANA LANGER Board Member —
PHYLLIS ALBERTSON Secretary —
SCOTT LAURETTI CHAIRMAN —
CAROL BELL Board Member —
MAREK LEWANDA Board Member —
CAROLYN BROWN Board Member —
ROGER MOSS Board Member —
STACI DONEGAN Board Member —
DAPHNE NASH Board Member —
NINA EIDELL EXECUTIVE CO —
SAMIR NIKOCEVIC Board Member —
RACHEL FIELDS Board Member —
TERRI O'NEIL Board Member —
KENNETH BUD GREEN Treasurer —
KELLEY B PARKER Board Member —
LYON JEMISON Board Member —
WIM SALIEN Treasurer —
SCOTT LAURETTI Board President —
MICHAEL THAMES Board Member —
MAREK LEWANDA Board Member —
SUSAN WHITAKER Board Member —
ROGER MOSS Board Member —
RHEGAN WHITE-CLEMM Board President —
DAPHNE NASH Board Member —
KELLEY B PARKER Board Member —
RENEE PORTELL Board Member —
CINDY PRUTZMAN Board Member —
SUSAN WHITAKER EXECUTIVE CO —
RHEGAN WHITE-CLEMM CHAIRMAN —
MEL WHITEHEAD Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 209 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 55 points below the peer median (0 vs. 55).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 34 → 34 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.