Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 17.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 13.9% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 21.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 17.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 19.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 18.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 20.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 17.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 19.9% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 — — — 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2009 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA WALL Board Member —
SUSAN BIGG Board President —
BRIAN BOTSFORD Treasurer —
TAMMY JACKSON VICE PRESIDE —
LOIS THALKEN Board President —
KIM ANDERSON Board Member —
ELLERY BUTTERFIELD Board Member —
SUSAN GIERHAN Board Member —
MARILYN HADLEY Board Member —
DARLA HEGGEM Board Member —
BRYCE JENSEN Board Member —
KAREN RHOADS Board Member —
EMILY ROEMMICH Board Member —
KYLE SAYLER Board Member —
ROBERT SHAFFER Board Member —
JULIE SPIERS Secretary —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY BARTLING Board Member —
KATHY BOKENKAMP Board Member —
MICHAEL DELORM Board Member —
LORALEA FRANK Board Member —
SUSAN GIERHAN Board Member —
LAUREN HARBOLS Board Member —
BOB HEIDEN Board Member —
MATT JOHNSON Board Member —
STEPHEN LEWIS Board Member —
EMILY ROEMMICH Board Member —
JULIE SPIERS Secretary —
LOIS THALKEN Board Member —
ANN BAUER VICE PRESIDE —
BRIAN BOTSFORD Treasurer —
GARY DAVIS Board President —
LUIS OLIVAS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KELLY BARTLING Board Member —
KATHY BOKENKAMP Board Member —
KIMBERLY DART Board Member —
MICHAEL DELORM Board Member —
LORALEA FRANK Board Member —
LAUREN HARBOLS Board Member —
BOB HEIDEN Board Member —
MATT JOHNSON Board Member —
STEPHEN LEWIS Board Member —
VONDA LUNDELL Board Member —
LEE ANN PURDY Board Member —
JULIE SPIERS Board Member —
LOIS THALKEN Board Member —
ANN BAUER VICE PRESIDE —
BRIAN BOTSFORD Treasurer —
GARY DAVIS Board President —
YVONNE DEYLE Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 51 other orgs in NE with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 63 points below the peer median (0 vs. 63).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.