Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
52
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 31.4% 52 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 53.5% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 30.1% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 61 Stable Stable Watch
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 53 Fragile Recovery
2015 51 Fragile Recovery
2014 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 53 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 53 Fragile Recovery
2011 43 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Frederick Binkholder Artistic Director 30.0% of Rev
Frederick Binkholder Artistic Director 24.8% of Rev
Raymond Brad Rinaldo Accompanist 8.5% of Rev
Brent Erstad - Outgoing Accompanist 6.7% of Rev
Radharani De Board President
Samuel Holliday Board President
Erik Lundgren Treasurer
Robyn Alexander Secretary
JP Barringer Board Member
Bruce Purdy Board Member
Katrina Tselentis Board Member
Clare Blackwell Board Member
Ilene Schwartz Board Member
Princeton Miles Board Member
Jessica Chaiken Board Member
Pamela Karg Board Member
Nancy Broers Board Member
Suzanne Silber Board Member
Radharani De Board President
Samuel Holliday Board President
Erik Lundgren Treasurer
Robyn Alexander Secretary
Jessica Chaiken Board Member
Bruce Purdy Board Member
Amy Davis Board Member
JP Barringer Board Member
Princeton Miles Board Member
Katrina Tselentis Board Member
Pamela Karg Board Member
Nancy Broers Board Member
Hanna Veder Board Member
Ana Harvey Board Member
Raymond Brad Rinaldo - Incoming Accompanist

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Frederick Binkholder Artistic Director 25.8% of Rev
Kelly Lenahan Accompanist 6.1% of Rev
Bruce Purdy Board President
Radha De Board President
Jessica Chaiken Secretary
Margaret Neily Treasurer
Robyn Alexander Board Member
Jennie Weyman Board Member
John P Barringer Board Member
Arielle Hollies Board Member
Amy Davis Board Member
Joshua Turner Board Member
Laurie Rubiner Board Member
Nancy Broers Board Member
Ana Harvey Dir., Community Rep
Hanna Veder Dir., Community Rep

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Frederick Binkholder Artistic Director 21.9% of Rev
Kelly Lenahan Accompanist 5.4% of Rev
Jessica Chaiken Board President
Amy Davis Board President
Beth Hague Secretary
Margaret Neily Treasurer
Robyn Alexander Board Member
Katherine Rubida Board Member
Kate Hibbs Board Member
Bruce Purdy Board President
Jennie Weyman Board Member
John P Barringer Board Member
Radha De Board President
Arielle Hollies Board Member
Joshua Turner Board Member
Linda Naditch Board Member
Jeff Serfass Board Member
Nancy Broers Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 55 other orgs in DC with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 51 points above the peer median (75 vs. 24).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 31.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~19 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.