Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 10.5% 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 10.7% 47 Fragile Recovery
2020 18.4% 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 3.6% 48 Fragile Recovery
2017 19.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 14.0% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ASHER JOHNSON Board President 0.3% of Rev
DEB GOOD-ZEINER Board President
AMY HOFFMAN Secretary
TOM KONAS Treasurer
KYLE BRUBAKER Board Member
AIDEN THOMAS Board Member
JEREMY PATTERSON Board Member
TERRY CARROLL Board Member
KEVIN WOLEAB Board Member
JONI MCCRADY Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES JOHNSON Artistic Director 12.7% of Rev
DEB GOOD-ZEINER Board Member
AMY HOFFMAN Board Member
JULIA HOWEY Treasurer
ASHER JOHNSON Board Member
LINDY KEEFE Secretary
TOM KONAS Treasurer
SCOTT MACKISON VICE-CHAIRMA
JONI MCCRADY Board Member
JOSH RINIER Board Member
JOHN SHIREY Board Member
KYLE BRUBAKER CHAIRMAN
BETH GABLE ADMIN DIRECT
LIZ GARNER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 295 other orgs in PA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 13 points above the peer median (50 vs. 37).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.