Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 16.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 9.4% 38 Fragile Recovery
2021 15.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 8.7% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 5.8% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 6.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 8.4% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 2.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 4.0% 38 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
EUGENE WATANABE EXECUTIVE D 6.3% of Rev
JUSTIN MORGAN EXECUTIVE DI 4.1% of Rev
DIANA PETERSON Board President
RICHARD TAYLOR Board President
SAM ANDERSON Treasurer
ART DUMMER Board President
DEBORAH MOENCH Board Member
KAREN PETERSON Board Member
BARRY BICKMORE Board Member
RACHAEL IVORY Board Member
GREG TRIMBLE Board Member
JOSH WHISENANT Board Member
EUGENE WATANABE EXECUTIVE D
DIANA PETERSON Board President
RICHARD TAYLOR Board President
SAM ANDERSON Treasurer
ART DUMMER Board President
DEBORAH MOENCH Board Member
KAREN PETERSON Board Member
BARRY BICKMORE Board Member
RACHAEL IVORY Board Member
GREG TRIMBLE Board Member
JOSH WHISENANT Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Eugene Watanabe Board Member 5.5% of Rev
Heather Moore Executive Dir. 5.3% of Rev
Eugene Watanabe Board Member 5.1% of Rev
Heather Moore Executive Dir. 4.6% of Rev
Joanne Rowland Secretary 0.4% of Rev
Joanne Rowland Secretary 0.4% of Rev
Arthur Dummer Chairman
Scott Huntsman Treasurer
Debbie Moench Board Member
Diana Peterson Board Member
Sam Anderson Board Member
Dr JP Hughes Board Member
Scott Epstein Board Member
Rinar Erickson Board Member
Gary Larson Board Member
Michelle Wester Board Member
Jennifer Zemp Board Member
Justin Morgan Interim Ex Dir.
Arthur Dummer Chairman
Scott Huntsman Treasurer
Debbie Moench Board Member
Diana Peterson Board Member
Sam Anderson Board Member
Dr JP Hughes Board Member
Scott Epstein Board Member
Rinar Erickson Board Member
Gary Larson Board Member
Michelle Wester Board Member
Jennifer Zemp Board Member
Justin Morgan Interim Ex Dir.
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 19 other orgs in UT with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 33 points above the peer median (60 vs. 27).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.