Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
15
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 36.5% 15 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 32.4% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 14.4% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 742.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 21.1% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — 12.9% 43 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 31.0% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2016 — — 30.0% 17 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 25.9% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 15.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 19.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 20.5% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 19.1% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEY STEINHAGEN Board Member 22.8% of Rev
BENJAMIN COSTELLO Board Member —
JORDAN FEARON Board President —
KERALI REYNOLDS Secretary —
JENNY MILLER Treasurer —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEY STEINHAGEN Board Member 36.5% of Rev
HEIDI GOLDSTEIN Board President —
JORDAN FEARON Board President —
JANELLE ALVSTAD-MATTSON Board Member —
PETER WARNER Board Member —
JENNY MILLER Treasurer —
KAYLA LYON Treasurer —
JYL DOWD Board Member —
BENJAMIN COSTELLO Board Member —
KERALI REYNOLDS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEY STEINHAGEN Board Member 18.3% of Rev
HEIDI GOLDSTEIN Board President —
JORDAN FEARON Board President —
JANELLE ALVSTAD-MATTSON Board Member —
PETER WARNER Board Member —
JENNY MILLER Board Member —
KAYLA LYON Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOEY STEINHAGEN Board Member 36.5% of Rev
JOEY STEINHAGEN Board Member 30.1% of Rev
JORDAN FEARON Board President 1.4% of Rev
HEIDI GOLDSTEIN Board Member —
CATHERINE THRASHER-CARROLL Board Member —
JANELLE ALVSTAD-MATTSON Board Member —
PETER WARNER Board Member —
MATT DOBUSH Board Member —
MARTIN CROSS Treasurer —
KAYLA LYON Treasurer —
JEN KAISER Secretary —
LAUREN LOIACANO Board Member —
HEIDI GOLDSTEIN Board Member —
JORDAN FEARON Board President —
JANELLE ALVSTAD-MATTSON Board Member —
PETER WARNER Board Member —
MATT DOBUSH Board Member —
KAYLA LYON Treasurer —
JEN KAISER Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
15 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,226 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 36.5% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~29 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.