Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 55 Fragile Recovery
2022 30.5% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 49.1% 48 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 76.2% 54 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 61 Stable Stable Watch
2016 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 61 Stable Stable Watch
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONALI SKANDAN Artistic Director 28.3% of Rev
NITHYA SHARMA Secretary
MIRNA MOHANRAJ Treasurer
RUDRANI BANIK Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONALI SKANDAN Artistic Director 30.8% of Rev
HARINI GOTETI Secretary
MIRNA MOHANRAJ Treasurer
RANI BANIK Board President

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONALI SKANDAN Artistic Director 27.8% of Rev
AMI JAIN Secretary
PIYALI KOTHARI Board Member
RUDRANI BANIK Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SONALI SKANDAN Artistic Director 27.6% of Rev
AMI JAIN Secretary
PIYALI KOTHARI Board Member
RUDRANI BANIK Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 146 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points above the peer median (75 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.