Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
25
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
15
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 32.4% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 23.2% 40 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 37.4% 37 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 16.7% 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 25.1% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 55 Fragile Recovery
2011 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RYAN CROWDER Artistic Director 15.6% of Rev
CHRISSY FLANIGAN Board Member
REBECCA OSBORNE Secretary
KURT WHEELER Board Member
SUE DUNCAN Board Member
SARAH ROCHE Board Member
PAUL RODRIQUEZ Board Member
JULIE RHODES Board Member
TODD RIGGAN Board Member
AMY MCANDREW Board Member
TAMMY RIGGAN Treasurer
NATHAN JERKINS Board Member
PENNY BILLINGSLEY Board Member
ERIN BLOCK Board Member
DEDE BULLOCK Board Member
RANDALL ROBINSON Board President
BRETT WEAVER Board President

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jasmine Schimmel Board Member
Rebecca Osborne Secretary
Kacy Hill Board Member
Sue Duncan Board Member
Sarah Roche Board Member
Paul Rodriguez Board Member
Julie Rhodes Board Member
Todd Riggan Board Member
Amy McAndrew Board Member
Tammy Riggan Treasurer
Nathan Jerkins Artistic Director
Ryan Crowder Artistic Director
Penny Billingsley Board Member
Erin Block Board Member
Dede Bullock Board Member
Randall Robinson Board President
Brett Weaver Board President

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ryan Crowder Artistic Director 31.2% of Rev
Nathan Jerkins Artistic Director 5.6% of Rev
Brett Weaver Board Member
Randall Robinson Board President
Erin Block Board Member
Nigel OHearn Board Member
Amy McAndrew Board Member
Dede Bullock Board Member
Edna Rehbein Board Member
Cathie Fincannon Treasurer
Rob Brown Board President
Penny Billingsley Board Member
Amy Minor Board Member
Chrishuan Keller-Hanna Board Member
Kathy Frederick Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ryan Crowder Artistic Director 28.0% of Rev
Amy Minor Board Member
Chrishuan Keller-Hanna Board President
Edna Rehbein Board Member
Brett Weaver Board Member
Randy Robinson Board Member
Nathan Jerkins Artistic Director
Rob Brown Board President
Penny Billingsley Board Member
Molly Bucy Board Member
Kathy Frederick Secretary
Cathie Fincannon Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
15 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
25 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 132 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 32.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~21 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.