Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — — 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 — — — 48 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 35 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 17.5% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 26.0% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 25.7% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 16.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 16.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 12.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rita Amisson Board Member —
Sandra Hall Board Member —
Rebecca Brinson Board Member —
Laura Miles Board Member —
Daphne Tuten Board Member —
Carmen Salerno Board Member —
Sandra Dunbar Board Member —
Cleveland Shy Board Member —
Courtney Williams Board Member —
Ethan Lovett Board Member —
Jenny Dell Board Member —
Mariam Mirabzadeh Board Member —
Sina Griffith Board Member —
Bunkie Arline Co-Chairman —
Julia Singletary Secretary —
Joshua Sharp Treasurer —
Jami Porter Co-Chairman —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Rita Amisson Board Member —
Sandra Hall Board Member —
Margaret Hardy Board Member —
Laura Miles Board Member —
Daphne Tuten Board Member —
Ethan Lovett Board Member —
Jenny Dell Board Member —
Mariam Mirabzadeh Board Member —
Sina Griffith Board Member —
Jami Porter Board Member —
Bunkie Arline Co-Chairman —
Julia Singletary Secretary —
Lori Rawlings Chairman —
Joshua Sharp Treasurer —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bunkie Arline Board Member —
Tim Daniel Board Member —
Britney Glass Board Member —
Bunkie Arline Board Member —
Elizabeth Strickland Board Member —
Tim Daniel Board Member —
Daphne Tuten Board Member —
Sandra Hall Board Member —
Jenni Wright Board Member —
Elizabeth Strickland Board Member —
Judith Cordista Board Member —
Daphne Tuten Board Member —
Shanna Derby Board Member —
Julia Singletary Board Member —
Joyce Goggins Board Member —
Ethan Lovett Board Member —
Julie Spence Board Member —
Jenny Dell Board Member —
Molly Squires Board Member —
Joyce Goggins Board Member —
Sandra Hall Chairman —
Sina Griffith Board Member —
Lori Rawlings Co-Chairman —
Margaret Singletary Co-Chairman —
Mike Caulley Treasurer —
Lori Rawlings Chairman —
Tia White Secretary —
Mike Caulley Treasurer —
Tia White Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 209 other orgs in GA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 45 → 48 over 5 years (improving by 3 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.