Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
32
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2022 57.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2020 58.8% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 45.8% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ALEXANDRA HOLLOWAY Vice PresidentArtisti 19.4% of Rev
JAMES C HOLLOWAY PresidentGeneral Dir 10.5% of Rev
HANNAH HOLLOWAY Treasurer 8.7% of Rev
SUZANNE SELLNER Secretary
VICTORIA SARVADI Board Member
ELAINE SCOTT Board Member
JACQUELYN THORNTON Board Member
GREGORY HALL Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
James Christopher Holloway Board President 8.6% of Rev
Alexandra Holloway Artistic Director 8.5% of Rev
Suzanne Sellner Secretary
Hannah Holloway Treasurer
Victoria Sarvadi Board Member
Elaine Scott Board Member
Jacquelyn Thornton Board Member
Gregory Hall Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in TX for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 43.3% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.