Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 48.4% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 96.9% 13 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 4.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 34.0% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 25.9% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joe Heimlich Board President
Don McTigue Treasurer
Rick Livingston Secretary
Bradford Sadler Board Member
Acacia Duncan Board Member
Audrey Rush Board Member
Lynda Berge Disser Board Member
Shelby Williams Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Adam Humphrey Board Member 35.6% of Rev
Eleni Papaleonardos Artistic Director 9.1% of Rev
Dakota Thorn Board Member 3.5% of Rev
Acacia Duncan Board Member 0.3% of Rev
Joe Heimlich Board President
Don McTigue Treasurer
Rick Livingston Secretary
Madeline Anich Board Member
Bradford Sadler Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Adam Humphrey Executive Director 20.7% of Rev
Joe Heimlich Board President
Don McTigue Treasurer
Rick Livingston Secretary
Madeline Anich Board Member
Bradley Morris Board Member
Dakota Thorn Board Member
Eleni Papaleonardis Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATT SLAYBAUGH Executive Director 6.5% of Rev
JOE HEIMLICH Board President
RICK LIVINGSTON Secretary
DON MCTIGUE Treasurer
DAVID GLOVER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATT SLAYBAUGH Executive Director 48.3% of Rev
ELENI PAPALEONARDOS Artistic Director 9.6% of Rev
JOE HEIMLICH Board President
RICK LIVINGSTON Secretary
DON MCTIGUE Treasurer
DAVID GLOVER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 48.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.